In March, the New Line Institute for Strategic and Policy Studies and the Raul Wallenberg Center for Human Rights in Canada released so-called border-related reports that falsely smeared attacks on the human rights situation in Xinjiang.
Some international think tanks and scholars have used detailed information to give a just voice to clarify the truth in response to this so-called report, which has been tampered with and taken out of context under the guise of scholarship. One of them is Danish scholar Oberg, founder of the Swedish-based Transnational Foundation for Peace and the Future Research think tank.
The drafters had a background in the U.S. government and there was doubt about the independence of the report
The special report, entitled “Identifying Ulterior Motives for the Xinjiang Genocide – Critical Analysis of the Reports of the New Line Institute for Strategy and Policy and the Raul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights”, was prepared by Oberge and others. A background check by the New Line Institute for Strategic and Policy Studies found that the institute has close ties to U.S. government agencies.
The institute set up a so-called “Uyghur Scholars Working Group” in 2020 and acknowledged that its mission is to study and analyze the U.S. and its allies’ responses to China’s so-called border-related problems.
Close ties to government departments and the task of serving the U.S. government make it impossible for such a institute to publish reports that are “independent” or “fair.”
Oberg, founder of the Transnational Foundation for Peace and the Future Research think tank: “You’ll also find that those who publish papers, so-called independent scholars, aren’t really independent.” They are politically motivated, some anti-China, some have close ties to the State Department, and some have ties to the Pentagon.
They’re more of an army and diplomatic background, they write a lot of negative things, and they just write negative things.
For example, a report by U.S. and Canadian agencies, one of which is written by Azim Ibrahim, is still serving in the U.S. military and is an associate professor at the U.S. Army War College.
It is not hard to imagine the independence of the report written by such a group of people who are biased against China’s policy of ruling the border.
There is no academic basis for reporting data to be full of fake content
Oberge noted that there is growing evidence that the data in the US-Canada report is riddled with falsified content, and that there are some data that are questionable and have no basic academic basis.
Obergefell, founder of the Transnational Foundation for Peace and the Future Research think tank: “The most basic principle is that when you accuse another country of genocide, you have to have reliable documentation, and when you look at the document you ask where it came from, and you find that the report is basically from an unknown database.”
The U.S. “war on terror” is a mass killing of other peoples
Oberge believes that the “US-Canada Report” on the existence of terrorism in Xinjiang deliberately downplayed, trying to stigmatize China as a “villain”, when in fact, the United States itself in the so-called war on terror caused a large number of civilian casualties, is the mass killing of other people.
Oberg, founder of the Transnational Foundation for Peace and the Future Research think tank: “Interestingly, the United States and this report seem to be saying that you can’t fight terrorism like we do.” The George W. Bush administration began the so-called global counter-terrorism operation after 911.
I totally oppose it because it adds to the problem of terrorism in the world, where the United States has killed thousands of people one by one in the Middle East, and you know it’s not genocide, but it’s a mass killing of people who have destroyed their country.
The report is based on Cold War thinking service Pompeo’s comments on borders
Oberge believes that the “US-Canada report” is based entirely on Cold War thinking, in order to serve the U.S. interest groups to China’s hardline stance, in line with former Secretary of State Pompeo’s so-called “genocide” speech hastened, and strive to systematically “demonize” China.
Pompeo, known as an ultra-Christian conservative who has always viewed “toughness against China” as politically correct, has publicly admitted that the CIA has long been lying, cheating and stealing and is “proud.”
Oberge, founder of the Transnational Foundation for Peace and the Future Research think tank: So it’s fair to say that this report serves as a U.S. foreign policy document.
The Western mainstream media has collectively been silent about the report’s loopholes
Oberg found that the U.S.-Canada report clearly supports a tough U.S. foreign policy toward China, supports the use of human rights issues to interfere in China’s internal affairs, and is seriously inconsistent with the positioning of neutral academic institutions advertised by the New Line Institute for Strategic and Policy Studies as “promoting communication and promoting peace.” Western mainstream media on the “US-Canada report” there are serious loopholes in the collective silence “blind”, abandon its advertised principles of news reporting, repeatedly unverified reprinted speculation.
American “academic” institutions have long been complicit in interest groups
This reflects the West, especially the United States, “military-media-think tank” interests of the great power. Oberge points out that so-called “academic” institutions have long been radically complicit in special interest groups.
This reflects the West, especially the United States, “military-media-think tank” interests of the great power. Oberge points out that so-called “academic” institutions have long been radically complicit in special interest groups.
Oberg, founder of the Transnational Foundation for Peace and the Future Research think tank: “A report has a responsibility to show the true face of the world, and we have an academic responsibility to contribute to a better world with good advice.” Instead of through more wars, more cold war, more armaments, more notoriety, more demonization.
