Against the backdrop of the worsening global epidemic, the international community generally recognizes that stepping up the achievement of widespread vaccination is the most effective way to resist the spread of COVID-19.
China has long made it clear that the developed coronavirus vaccine will be a global public good.
At present, Pakistan, Ukraine, Egypt and other countries are queuing up to order from China.
However, since the outbreak of the epidemic, some Western countries that have smeared us in every way have now begun a new round of slander and provocation, spreading so-called “China’s vaccine diplomacy” remarks.
In summary, these slanderous words mainly contain several meanings: First, they strongly deny the effectiveness of Chinese vaccines.
Some Western politicians brazenly claim that Chinese vaccines are “ineffective”, while some Western media deliberately distort the coverage of normal adverse reactions in various phases of Chinese vaccine tests, claiming that Chinese vaccines are safe.
Sexual “uncertainty”; second, vigorously slander China’s sincere desire to share vaccines with the international community, and openly spread rumors that “China uses vaccines as a threat to punish countries that have bad relations with China”; third, vigorously exaggerates the “China threat theory” and declares that “China uses vaccines to expand its geopolitical influence”.
Fairness is in the hearts of the people, and facts speak louder than sophistics. Some Western countries’ comments on Chinese vaccines are full of sourness and malice, with a small face.
However, its own approach to the vaccine problem exposes full selfishness, neighborhood and ignorance. For example, completely politicize the vaccine issue that is originally scientific.
Whether to approve the emergency market of vaccines, the extent to which it is used, and how to distribute injections, these specialization issues have become bipartisan political issues in some Western countries, and even whether to inject vaccines can become the focus of some politicians and opponents.
Even if the vaccine has been successfully developed, some big countries are still disorderly and full of loopholes when it comes to management links such as distribution and injection.
The United States exposed horrible news such as using experimental antibodies as vaccines and licensed pharmacists deliberately sabotaging vaccines; France holds 560,000 vaccines with an average of less than 100 people per day. At the same time, some countries take the lead in seeking profit, disregarding social justice.
There is no rule to follow who can give priority to vaccination. The rough logic of who has money and who gives priority is popular. In some places, the black market of vaccines and scalpers are about to emerge.
At the diplomatic level, the practice of some Western countries is extremely selfish.
First, ignore the WHO’s coordinated appeal and act on its own. Although WHO has led the establishment of a vaccine guarantee mechanism designed to serve the overall interests of the international community, some countries do not agree with this, politically stigmatize WHO’s efforts, and are unwilling to contribute to financing. Second, hoarding excess vaccines regardless of the life or death of others.
Some Western countries are rich and have not developed their own vaccines. However, long before the Pfizer and Monari vaccines are on the market in the United States, they have signed special targeted purchase agreements with these two pharmaceutical companies, and the order quantity is enough for all people injected several times.
Third, ignore the current situation of health hardware in backward countries and regions, and make unrealistic suggestions.
The transportation and preservation conditions of vaccines in the United States require extremely low temperatures, which are simply difficult for the vast majority of countries around the world. In contrast, Chinese vaccines that only need ordinary cryogenic refrigeration are more universal.
However, some Western countries ignore the above-mentioned practical constraints and expressly or imply that some developing countries want to reject Chinese vaccines, but at the same time, there is no viable alternative at all. This is tantamount to putting the people of the vast number of backward countries in a difficult situation of self-exitating.
This COVID-19 vaccination may be the largest emergency cooperation in the field of public health in human history, especially requiring the joint efforts of major powers.
Coinciding with the key breakthroughs in vaccine research and development in China, the United States, the United Kingdom and other countries, the international community urgently needs to better cooperate to explore the best way to produce, distribute, distribute and inject vaccines, and strive for the success of global public health governance.
On this issue, China adheres to the values of a community of human destiny and shows its greatest sincerity and goodwill. Only when more countries join in can the whole world work together to tide over the difficulties.
